Gujarat became number one state in India in terms of big project investment during the four years 2005-06 to 2008-09. Then the slowdown in investment has started.
______________________
State-wise Distribution of Institutionally Assisted Projects: 2003-04 to 2012-13
| ||||||||||||||||||||
State
|
2003-04
|
2004-05
|
2005-06
|
2006-07
|
2007-08
|
2008-09
|
2009-10
|
2010-11
|
2011-12
|
2012-13
| ||||||||||
Num-ber of Pro-jects
|
Per cent Share
|
Num-ber of Pro-jects
|
Per cent Share
|
Num-ber of Pro-jects
|
Per cent Share
|
Num-ber of Pro-jects
|
Per cent Share
|
Num-ber of Pro-jects
|
Per cent Share
|
Num-ber of Pro-jects
|
Per cent Share
|
Num-ber of Pro-jects
|
Per cent Share
|
Num-ber of Pro-jects
|
Per cent Share
|
Num-ber of Pro-jects
|
Per cent Share
|
Num-ber of Pro-jects
|
Per cent Share
| |
| Odisha |
19
|
2.2
|
30
|
9.9
|
20
|
3.4
|
23
|
5.4
|
21
|
13.1
|
15
|
9.0
|
25
|
13.9
|
25
|
7.4
|
15
|
6.3
|
12
|
27.0
|
| Maharashtra |
69
|
9.9
|
102
|
10.4
|
121
|
18.9
|
140
|
8.7
|
141
|
9.7
|
110
|
18.1
|
117
|
10.0
|
71
|
7.4
|
86
|
19.1
|
70
|
10.9
|
| Punjab |
30
|
1.4
|
32
|
2.8
|
27
|
1.6
|
48
|
2.1
|
29
|
0.7
|
23
|
0.7
|
23
|
0.4
|
38
|
1.1
|
37
|
1.7
|
12
|
10.5
|
| Andhra Pradesh |
53
|
5.3
|
38
|
3.5
|
76
|
8.6
|
103
|
8.7
|
87
|
7.8
|
74
|
7.6
|
73
|
7.1
|
65
|
11.4
|
52
|
5.1
|
36
|
5.6
|
| Gujarat |
73
|
9.1
|
81
|
11.7
|
95
|
18.7
|
84
|
26.3
|
95
|
26.4
|
75
|
18.4
|
69
|
3.2
|
65
|
9.6
|
75
|
9.0
|
58
|
5.4
|
| Rajasthan |
47
|
3.3
|
26
|
1.7
|
27
|
1.9
|
38
|
3.6
|
22
|
1.2
|
22
|
0.6
|
23
|
2.9
|
28
|
0.8
|
49
|
4.9
|
41
|
5.1
|
| Madhya Pradesh |
9
|
2.6
|
19
|
0.8
|
12
|
1.9
|
23
|
1.8
|
18
|
0.6
|
20
|
7.2
|
23
|
4.2
|
21
|
5.2
|
16
|
5.6
|
14
|
4.4
|
| Uttar Pradesh |
39
|
3.7
|
23
|
1.4
|
50
|
7.9
|
60
|
3.6
|
41
|
4.2
|
32
|
3.1
|
27
|
0.4
|
32
|
4.6
|
42
|
7.8
|
27
|
4.4
|
| Chhattisgarh |
15
|
8.3
|
40
|
9.2
|
19
|
3.9
|
13
|
0.9
|
10
|
4.7
|
16
|
2.3
|
23
|
6.0
|
31
|
12.1
|
11
|
2.4
|
9
|
4.0
|
| Arunachal Pradesh |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
0.1
|
3
|
3.3
|
1
|
0.2
|
1
|
0.5
|
2
|
3.9
|
| Tamil Nadu |
67
|
4.0
|
110
|
10.6
|
124
|
9.3
|
156
|
6.9
|
94
|
5.1
|
63
|
2.3
|
66
|
5.5
|
93
|
6.1
|
58
|
5.7
|
23
|
1.8
|
| Karnataka |
35
|
2.3
|
50
|
7.1
|
51
|
3.5
|
91
|
7.2
|
62
|
4.1
|
44
|
2.4
|
42
|
1.4
|
40
|
7.2
|
39
|
12.0
|
20
|
1.5
|
| Haryana |
17
|
0.4
|
21
|
1.5
|
29
|
1.4
|
42
|
1.4
|
28
|
1.2
|
24
|
1.1
|
29
|
2.6
|
35
|
0.8
|
45
|
1.4
|
19
|
1.2
|
| Jharkhand |
4
|
0.3
|
9
|
0.3
|
8
|
0.3
|
13
|
2.6
|
15
|
2.9
|
9
|
1.7
|
11
|
2.7
|
9
|
3.5
|
12
|
1.3
|
8
|
1.2
|
| West Bengal |
29
|
1.5
|
40
|
2.5
|
27
|
1.9
|
37
|
1.2
|
41
|
2.6
|
43
|
3.0
|
33
|
2.6
|
29
|
3.3
|
19
|
4.9
|
13
|
0.9
|
| Uttarakhand |
-
|
-
|
10
|
0.6
|
24
|
2.3
|
31
|
2.0
|
27
|
0.7
|
19
|
0.8
|
23
|
0.7
|
10
|
0.1
|
7
|
1.4
|
5
|
0.6
|
| Delhi |
19
|
4.6
|
12
|
1.6
|
24
|
1.6
|
19
|
2.3
|
19
|
1.4
|
13
|
0.7
|
10
|
1.3
|
9
|
0.7
|
9
|
1.3
|
4
|
0.5
|
| Bihar |
1
|
0.1
|
1
|
-
|
4
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
3
|
0.1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
3
|
0.1
|
3
|
4.0
|
7
|
0.1
|
| Multiple# |
14
|
39.1
|
33
|
20.1
|
29
|
4.4
|
46
|
9.2
|
61
|
10.3
|
55
|
19.0
|
45
|
29.0
|
48
|
16.2
|
34
|
4.5
|
16
|
8.3
|
| Others@ |
47
|
1.8
|
43
|
4.2
|
45
|
8.6
|
76
|
6.0
|
54
|
3.2
|
50
|
1.9
|
63
|
2.8
|
44
|
2.2
|
26
|
1.5
|
29
|
2.7
|
| Total |
587
|
100.0
|
720
|
100.0
|
812
|
100.0
|
1045
|
100.0
|
868
|
100.0
|
708
|
100.0
|
729
|
100.0
|
697
|
100.0
|
636
|
100.0
|
425
|
100.0
|
| Total Cost of Projects (Rs. in Billion) |
685
|
939
|
1,313
|
2,754
|
2,297
|
3,111
|
4,095
|
3,752
|
1,916
|
1,963
| ||||||||||
#: Comprise projects over several States.
@: Comprise States/Union Territories, each with share less than one per cent in aggregate cost of projects. - : Nil/Negligible.
Source of the table
http://rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_ViewBulletin.aspx?Id=14414
___________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment